Last week, socialbutterfly shared a few insights about the Pew Internet and American Life Project, a study on how internet users in America spend their time.
The study broke down time spent in various different activities, including:
- 49% Use a search engine to find information
- 41% Get news
- 37% Use an online social networking site
- 2% Use Twitter or another status-update service
- 1% Make a donation to a charity online
See full breakdown here.
A drive by analysis of the above data might conclude that online fundraising strategies don’t work, or that the internet sucks.
It takes a village to raise a dollar
If we combine the Pew study with the donorCentrics Internet and Multichannel Giving Benchmarking Report, we get a much more hopeful picture.
For example, it’s more common for new donors to give online. And those online-acquired donors tend to give much larger gifts over time than donors acquired by direct mail. So that 1% above is a small but very valuable group.
Twitter users are smart fundraisers
And what about Twitter? Blackbaud found that people who added Twitter to their fundraising toolbox consistently exceeded their goals, compared to those who didn’t use Twitter. So the 2% that use Twitter are some of your smartest fundraisers!
When asking for online donations is a time suck
A drive by strategist might conclude that spending more time asking for money makes sense because online donors give more over time. But if that’s your first contact with them, you’ll waste your time (except crisis giving).
Planted seeds don’t bear fruit the next day
Any smart fundraiser knows that connections always come before commerce, and that the best path is to find your supporters, converse with them (this will take time), nurturing a sense of ownership, and then getting out of the way.